Board and Committee Pack Preparation with a source map
Board and committee papers are assembled from approved inputs, checked for completeness against the agenda, and given a cover summary with a source map. No figure enters that its owner did not supply.
The problem it answers
Board papers are assembled by hand from many owners, and iSystematic's Board and Committee Pack Preparation solution assembles them from approved inputs, with a source map for each paper.
What it does
It collects approved inputs, checks completeness against the agenda, and drafts the cover summary with a source map. No figure enters the pack that its owner did not supply.
A missing paper or missing data is shown as a gap, not filled in.
The pack follows the board's cadence and decision rights and names each paper's owner. It can also carry the organisation's current four-altitude profile under the MESA Framework™, so the board sees which altitude is weak.
At municipal scale, the same preparation serves council and committee packages.
Built from
It is built from two catalogue workflows and three catalogue patterns.
| Id | Name | What it brings |
|---|---|---|
| W19 | Weekly Owner Review | Supplied figures only; missing data shown; observation kept apart from interpretation |
| W20 | Research to Decision Memo | Evidence kept apart from assumptions and unknowns |
| P01 | Retrieve, Ground, Draft, Review | Approved inputs and cited passages |
| P02 | Extract, Validate, Propose | Figures and dates validated; missing values are never inferred |
| P08 | Fail Visibly | A missing paper is a visible gap |
What it is built on
Three parts of the framework corpus decide what enters the pack, and each leaves a record the client keeps.
| Framework | In this solution | Client keeps |
|---|---|---|
| MESA Framework™ | The pack can carry the organisation's current four-altitude profile, so the board sees which altitude is weak | MESA profile page |
| CADRE™ (AI governance operating model) | The pack follows the board cadence and decision rights; each paper's owner is named | Cadence and owner record |
| PEVG | No figure enters the pack that its owner did not supply; the verifier checks completeness against the agenda | Source map per paper |
Five parts apply to every build and are not repeated here: decision rights, the five gate records, a BOE Declaration per control, a vendor assessment for every vendor, and incident response. How we build sets out all of them.
The evidence it leaves behind
Every pack leaves records the client keeps.
- A source map for each paper
- A cadence and owner record
- A MESA profile page, where the pack carries one
- The five gate records and a BOE Declaration per control, as for every build
Typical buyer
The typical buyer is a corporate secretary or the office of the chief financial officer; at a municipality, the clerk's office.
Status
Proposed, as of 9 October 2026. A solution becomes Piloting or Released only after a documented pilot, and no result is shown for it before then.
How to start
Most organisations start with the Automation Assessment. When pack preparation is already the clear first task, a six-week Pilot runs it for one board or committee cycle, with the baseline measured first.
Where to go next
Operations leaders
For COOs: iSystematic's two-week Automation Assessment scores ten candidate tasks, recommends three solutions and sets a baseline before anything is built.
Read more →Municipalities
Municipalities: iSystematic starts with a staff AI-use policy or an Automation Assessment, then prepares council packages and resident answers you approve.
Read more →Leadership Briefing Desk
The Leadership Briefing Desk gives executives a dated briefing from approved sources, every item traced to its source, with a list of what it could not reach.
Read more →Research-to-Decision Office
The Research-to-Decision Office turns a question into an evidence ledger and a one-page decision memo that separates evidence, assumptions and unknowns.
Read more →How we build
How iSystematic builds: every solution uses the same deposited frameworks. See what each part decides, what the client keeps, and each specification's DOI.
Read more →Conformance is self-declared; no regulator endorses this work.
Start with the Automation Assessment
Two weeks, a fixed fee shared on a short call, ten candidate tasks scored and three solutions recommended.